复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 45-54.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20260128.007

• 基础与力学性能研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

增材制造C-CFRP拉伸及压缩跨层断裂仿真及试验研究

孙光永1,2, 王勤淮1, 贾晓航1, 庞通1, 罗俊杰1*   

  1. 1.湖南大学 整车先进设计制造技术全国重点实验室,长沙 410082;
    2.湖南大学 重庆研究院,重庆 401121
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-31 出版日期:2026-01-28 发布日期:2026-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 罗俊杰(1998—),男,博士,研究方向为复合材料装备轻量化设计,junjieluo@hnu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:孙光永(1981—),男,博士,教授,研究方向为轻量化技术与安全防护。
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金项目资助(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1040)

Numerical and experimental study on tensile and compressive translaminar fracture of additively manufactured C-CFRP

SUN Guangyong1,2, WANG Qinhuai1, JIA Xiaohang1, PANG Tong1, LUO Junjie1*   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology for Vehicle, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;
    2. Research Institute of Hunan University in Chongqing, Chongqing 401121, China
  • Received:2024-12-31 Online:2026-01-28 Published:2026-03-12

摘要: 具有高设计自由度的增材制造连续碳纤维增强复合材料(Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer,C-CFRP)取得了高速发展,然而尚未有关于其跨层断裂力学性能的详细研究。本文基于[0/90]4S铺层的增材制造C-CFRP试样,开展了紧凑拉伸(Compact Tension,CT)试验和紧凑压缩(Compact Compression,CC)试验,并通过X射线计算机断层扫描(Computed Tomography,CT)和扫描电子显微镜(Scanning Electron Microscope,SEM)表征了其失效模式,进而揭示了其失效机理。结果表明增材制造C-CFRP拉伸断裂临界能量释放率为9.50~21.41 kJ/m2,压缩断裂临界能量释放率为22.18~188.97 kJ/m2。SEM结果表明拉伸断裂的微观失效模式包括纤维断裂、纤维拔出、界面脱黏等,且拉伸过程存在纤维桥接现象。值得注意的是,X射线断层扫描结果表明在CT试件尾端存在压缩失效模式。纤维桥接及尾端压缩失效使得拉伸断裂韧性随着裂纹长度增大而增大。CC试件宏观失效模式为屈曲和压剪断裂,由于压缩过程中断裂失效的材料仍具有承载能力,因此压缩断裂能也随着裂纹长度增大而增大。本研究揭示了增材制造C-CFRP拉伸及压缩断裂失效机理,同时为增材制造C-CFRP仿真模拟提供可靠的断裂参数。

关键词: 3D打印, 连续碳纤维增强复合材料, 断裂韧性, 紧凑拉伸, 紧凑压缩

Abstract: Additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymers (C-CFRP), known for their high design flexibility, have achieved rapid development; however, detailed studies on their intralaminar fracture performance remain lacking. In this study, compact tension (CT) and compact compression (CC) tests were conducted on additively manufactured C-CFRP specimens with a [0/90]4S layup. Failure mechanisms were characterized using X-ray computed tomography (CT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results indicate that the tensile critical energy release rate ranged from 9.50 to 21.41 kJ/m2, while the compressive critical energy release rates range from 22.18 to 188.97 kJ/m2. SEM analysis reveal that the microscopic failure mechanisms in tensile fracture included fiber breakage, fiber pull-out, and interfacial debonding, with evidence of fiber bridging during the tensile process. Notably, X-ray CT results show the presence of compressive failure modes at the end of the compact tension specimens. Fiber bridging and end compressive failure contribute to an increase in tensile fracture toughness with increasing crack length. During compressive fracture, the macroscopic failure modes include buckling and compression-shear failure. As the fractured material retained load-bearing capacity during compression, the compressive fracture energy also increases with increasing crack length. This study enhances the understanding of tensile and compressive fracture behaviors of additively manufactured C-CFRP and provides reliable fracture parameters for simulating these materials.

Key words: 3D-printed, C-CFRP, fracture toughness, compact tension, compact compression

中图分类号: