NiTi-SMA丝/环氧树脂界面黏结性能试验与数值模拟

doi:10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20250728.002

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7): 10-18.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20250728.002

NiTi-SMA丝/环氧树脂界面黏结性能试验与数值模拟

卢春玲^1,2, 甘潇², 杜诗远², 王强^1,2*, 朱万旭^1,2

1.广西绿色建材与建筑工业化重点实验室,桂林 541004;
2.桂林理工大学土木工程学院,桂林 541004

收稿日期:2024-05-27 出版日期:2025-07-28 发布日期:2025-08-22
通讯作者: 王强(1979—),男,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事结构加固方面的教学和研究工作,632544958@qq.com。
作者简介:卢春玲(1978—),女,博士,教授,主要从事结构加固方面的教学和研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52068014);广西自然科学基金(2023GXNSFAA026337)

Experimental and numerical simulation of bonding properties of NiTi-SMA wire/epoxy resin interface

LU Chunling^1,2, GAN Xiao², DU Shiyuan², WANG Qiang^1,2*, ZHU Wanxu^1,2

1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Green Building Materials and Construction Industrialization, Guilin 541004, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Received:2024-05-27 Online:2025-07-28 Published:2025-08-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了各因素对镍钛形状记忆合金(NiTi-SMA)丝/环氧树脂界面黏结性能的影响。首先通过SMA丝拔出试验测定SMA丝/环氧树脂界面的黏结强度,重点探究胶结剂种类、SMA丝黏结长度与预应变水平对界面破坏模式以及黏结强度的影响;然后基于内聚力模型对界面力学行为进行数值模拟,进一步分析SMA丝拔出过程的剪应力分布;最后根据试验结果建立荷载-滑移本构模型。结果表明:Sikadur-330 CN和Lica-102的破坏模式均为SMA丝/环氧树脂界面黏结破坏,且有效黏结长度处于2.0~3.0 cm之间。黏结性能最佳的是Sikadur-330 CN环氧浸渍树脂,其黏结强度约为另一胶体黏结强度的1.20~1.42倍。SMA丝预应变水平为12%时的黏结强度是其他预应变水平黏结强度的1.37~3.16倍。建立的荷载-滑移本构模型能够较好地模拟SMA丝/环氧树脂界面的力学行为。本研究可为FRP/SMA复合材料的设计制备以及实际工程应用提供一定的理论支撑。

关键词: 形状记忆合金, 环氧树脂, 界面黏结强度, 数值模拟, 本构模型

Abstract: Studied the influence of various factors on the interfacial bonding performance between nickel-titanium shape memory alloy (NiTi-SMA) wire/epoxy resin. Firstly, the bonding strength of the SMA wire/epoxy resin interface was determined by SMA wire pull-out tests, focusing on the effects of adhesive type, SMA wire bonding length, and prestrain level on the interfacial failure mode and bonding strength. Then, based on the cohesive zone model, numerical simulation of the interfacial mechanical behavior were conducted to further analyze the shear stress distribution during the SMA wire pull-out process. Finally, a load-slip constitutive model was established based on the experimental results. The results show that the failure modes of Sikadur-330 CN and Lica-102 are both interfacial bonding failures between SMA wire and epoxy resin, with effective bonding lengths ranging from 2.0 cm to 3.0 cm. The epoxy resin Sikadur-330 CN exhibits the best bonding performance, with a bonding strength approximately 1.20~1.42 times that of the other adhesive. The bonding strength at the prestrain level of 12% is 1.37~3.16 times that of other pre-strain levels. The established load-slip constitutive model can effectively simulate the mechanical behavior of the SMA wire/epoxy resin interface. This study provides theoretical support for the preparation and practical engineering applications of FRP/SMA composite materials.

Key words: shape memory alloys, epoxy resin, interfacial bonding strength, numerical simulation, constitutive model

中图分类号:

TB332

卢春玲, 甘潇, 杜诗远, 王强, 朱万旭. NiTi-SMA丝/环氧树脂界面黏结性能试验与数值模拟[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(7): 10-18.

LU Chunling, GAN Xiao, DU Shiyuan, WANG Qiang, ZHU Wanxu. Experimental and numerical simulation of bonding properties of NiTi-SMA wire/epoxy resin interface[J]. COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 0(7): 10-18.

参考文献

[1] ABDELRAHMAN K, EL-HACHA R. Analytical prediction model for circular SMA-confined reinforced concrete columns[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 213: 110547.
[2] SUHAIL R, AMATO G, MCCRUM D P. Heat-activated prestressing of NiTiNb shape memory alloy wires[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 206: 110128.
[3] 潘盛山, 乐锐, 惠华星, 等. NiTiNb-SMA丝主动加固RC圆柱抗震性能试验[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 47(7): 93-101.
[4] XU Y, OTSUKA K, TOYAMA N, et al. Fabrication technique of SMA/CFRP smart composites[C]//Proceedings SPIE 4946, Transducing Materials and Devices. Bellingham, WA: SPIE, 2003: 35-46.
[5] DAWOOD M, EL-TAHAN M W, ZHENG B. Bond behavior of superelastic shape memory alloys to carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2015, 77: 238-247.
[6] LV Z L, JIANG X, QIANG X H, et al. Strengthening feasibility of damaged steel plates repaired by self-stressing SMA-CFRP overlays[J]. Structural Engineering International, 2023, 32(2): 325-334.
[7] 王文炜, 周畅, 张亚飞, 等. CFRP/SMA复合材料片材增强钢筋混凝土梁抗弯性能试验研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2021, 29(2): 282-295.
[8] HAN T, DONG Z, ZHU H, et al. Compression behavior of concrete columns combinedly confined by FRP externally wrapped Fe-SMA[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 294: 116754.
[9] 朱同舟, 袁国青. 压痕SMA丝复合材料界面本构与性能分析[J].复合材料科学与工程, 2021(1): 40-46.
[10] 刘燕斐. SMA/树脂界面粘结性能与金属界面摩擦性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2024.
[11] SHI M, ZHAO J, LIU J, et al. The interface adhesive properties and mechanical properties of shape memory alloy composites[J]. Fibers and Polymers, 2022, 23: 273-281.
[12] KHALILI S M R, SAEEDI A. Experimental investigation on the debonding strength in shape memory alloy wire reinforced polymers[J]. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2017, 24(6): 490-495.
[13] FATHI H, SHOKRIEH M M, SAEEDI A. A theoretical and experimental investigation on the stress distribution in the interface of pre-strained SMA wire/polymer composites[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 175: 107100.
[14] FATHI H, SHOKRIEH M M, SAEEDI A. Effect of tensile loading rate on interfacial properties of SMA/polymer composites[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2020, 183: 107730.
[15] 杨斌, 雷红帅, 王振清, 等. SMA丝表面纳米SiO₂改性对SMA/环氧树脂复合材料界面粘结强度的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2015, 32(5): 1341-1348.
[16] WANG Y L, ZHOU L M, WANG Z Q, et al. Analysis of internal stresses induced by strain recovery in a single SMA fiber-matrix composite[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2011, 42(5): 1135-1143.
[17] 中国钢铁工业协会. 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分: 室温试验方法: GB/T 228.1—2021[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2021.
[18] ZHOU L M, MAI Y W, BAILLIE C. Interfacial debonding and fiber pull-out stresses. Part Ⅴ: a methodology for evaluation of interfacial properties[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1994, 29(21): 5541-5550.
[19] CHOI E, MOHAMMADZADEH B, KIM D, et al. A new experimental investigation into the effects of reinforcing mortar beams with superelastic SMA fibers on controlling and closing cracks[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, 137: 140-152.
[20] 陆新征, 叶列平, 滕锦光, 等. FRP-混凝土界面粘结滑移本构模型[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2005(4): 10-18.

NiTi-SMA丝/环氧树脂界面黏结性能试验与数值模拟

Experimental and numerical simulation of bonding properties of NiTi-SMA wire/epoxy resin interface

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈燕荣, 王兴银, 许良, 孙琳, 王鑫. 腐蚀环境对碳纤维复合材料二次冲击损伤和剩余压缩强度的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(7): 27-32.
[2]	王烨煊, 高双, 高进城, 杨钒, 丁安心. 空心玻璃微珠填充环氧树脂复合泡沫材料压缩模量研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(7): 33-40.
[3]	雷世裕, 李玲, 曹伟, 王艺轩, 董夏瑞. 基于人工神经网络海因环氧树脂体系流变性的比较研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(7): 99-107.
[4]	彭砚双, 薛怿, 阳泽濠, 赵庆志, 张文强, 冯阳阳, 刘勇, 张辉, 俞建勇. 短切芳纶纤维网纱层间增韧CF/EP复合材料结构与性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(5): 15-21.
[5]	刘亚康, 倪文波, 王雪梅. 碳纤维复合材料铆接过程的数值与实验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(5): 90-95.
[6]	张高涛, 方志刚, 倪爱清, 边天涯, 李想, 李亮, 王继辉. 弯曲载荷下复合材料胶-螺混合连接结构破坏模式研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(4): 96-102.
[7]	冯京, 张鹏翔, 姜悦, 朱立平, 李爽, 席剑飞. 碳纤维/环氧树脂复合材料拉挤固化过程的数值模拟研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(3): 63-70.
[8]	杨成, 姜鹏飞, 朱立平, 董继萍, 王经元. 碳纤维及其复合材料温度相关热膨胀特性研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(1): 35-41.
[9]	黄研清, 王兴银, 许良, 王鑫, 周松. 不同腐蚀环境对含冲击损伤的碳纤维复合材料压缩性能的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(1): 97-103.
[10]	谢文博. 耐高温阻燃环氧树脂碳纤维复合材料性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(9): 43-47.
[11]	李嘉敏, 谭丽娜, 蒋函蔚, 范如意, 冉起超. 适用于RTM工艺的环氧改性苯并噁嗪树脂的性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(8): 11-16.
[12]	荣亚鹏, 陈允, 王亚祥, 李天辉, 陈荣, 李进. 环氧树脂复合材料残余应力检测技术研究进展[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(8): 110-118.
[13]	程圣, 谢志辉, 何伟韩, 张跃, 梁智明, 黄泽, 张伟, 冉起超. 二胺型苯并噁嗪改性双酚A环氧树脂及其玻璃纤维复合材料性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(6): 29-33.
[14]	战钺, 袁国青. 变形承载一体的基于形状记忆合金片状致动器的智能复合材料结构性能分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(6): 34-40.
[15]	潘超超, 李鹏, 潘春呈, 侯勇, 张兆斌, 陆泽栋. 热塑性复合材料玻璃纤维环氧成膜剂的制备与性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(6): 112-117.