基于MAT_58模型的碳纤维增强复合材料仿真参数捕捉与验证

doi:10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20250328.008

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 54-62.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20250328.008

基于MAT_58模型的碳纤维增强复合材料仿真参数捕捉与验证

邱星瀚¹, 宋通², 张赛², 王付胜¹, 孟宪明^2*, 陈亚军^1*

1.中国民航大学中欧航空工程师学院,天津 300300;
2.中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司,天津 300300

收稿日期:2024-02-23 出版日期:2025-03-28 发布日期:2025-04-21
通讯作者: 陈亚军(1976—),男,博士,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为复合材料损伤分析,yjchen@cauc.edu.cn。孟宪明(1980—),男,博士,正高级工程师,博士生导师,研究方向为汽车轻量化,mengxianming@catarc.ac.cn。
作者简介:邱星瀚(1999—),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为纤维增强复合材料有限元碰撞仿真。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划 (2019YFE0124100)

Parameters calibration and validation of carbon fiber reinforced composite based on *MAT_58 model

QIU Xinghan¹, SONG Tong², ZHANG Sai², WANG Fusheng¹, MENG Xianming^2*, CHEN Yajun^1*

1. Sino-European Institute of Aviation Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;
2. China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2024-02-23 Online:2025-03-28 Published:2025-04-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 预测纤维增强复合材料层压板的失效行为在工程应用中具有重要价值。利用万能电子试验机、冲击试验机,对一种碳纤维增强复合材料层压板在LS-DYNA有限元分析软件中的*MAT_58模型材料参数进行捕捉和验证。结果表明:单单元测试明确了*MAT_58模型材料参数在本构模型中的物理意义;通过双边缺口拉伸试验结合Bazant裂纹带模型计算出四边形单元尺寸为2 mm时的等效失效应变ERODS为0.56;落锤冲击试验峰值力对ERODS高度敏感,试验与仿真力-位移曲线吻合良好,峰值力误差最小为5.22%,验证了ERODS参数捕捉的有效性;纤维方向强度对于落锤冲击过程中的力学响应行为影响最大,面内剪切强度影响次之,基体方向强度影响最小。

关键词: 碳纤维增强复合材料, 有限元仿真, 单单元测试, 面内断裂韧性, 冲击响应

Abstract: It is of vital importance to predict the failure behavior of fiber reinforced composite laminates in engineering applications. In this paper, the parameters of material model *MAT_58 in LS-DYNA of a type of carbon fiber reinforced composite laminate were calibrated and validated, by using a universal electronic test machine and a drop-weight impact test machine. The results show that: the physical meaning of *MAT_58 parameters are specified by single element test; the effective failure strain is equals to 0.56 for 2 mm rectangular element by the double edge notched tension experiments combined with the Bazant crack band model; the peak force of the drop-weight impact experiment is highly sensitive to ERODS, the force-displacement curve of the experimental and simulation curves is in good agreement, with a minimum peak force error of 5.22%, which proves the effectiveness of ERODS; the fiber direction strength has the strongest effect on the mechanical response behavior during drop-weight impact, followed by in-plane shear strength and the matrix direction strength.

Key words: carbon fiber reinforced composite, finite element simulation, single element test, in-plane fracture toughness, impact response

中图分类号:

TB332

邱星瀚, 宋通, 张赛, 王付胜, 孟宪明, 陈亚军. 基于MAT_58模型的碳纤维增强复合材料仿真参数捕捉与验证[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(3): 54-62.

QIU Xinghan, SONG Tong, ZHANG Sai, WANG Fusheng, MENG Xianming, CHEN Yajun. Parameters calibration and validation of carbon fiber reinforced composite based on *MAT_58 model[J]. COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 0(3): 54-62.

参考文献

[1] 邢丽英, 冯志海, 包建文, 等. 碳纤维及树脂基复合材料产业发展面临的机遇与挑战[J]. 复合材料学报, 2020, 37(11): 2700-2706.
[2] FERABOLI P, WADE B, DELEO F, et al. LS-DYNA MAT54 modeling of the axial crushing of a composite tape sinusoidal specimen[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2011, 42(11): 1809-1825.
[3] CHERNIAEV A, BUTCHER C J, MONTESANO J. Predicting the axial crush response of CFRP tubes using three damage-based constitutive models[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 129: 349-364.
[4] 孟宪明, 钟正, 程从前, 等. 基于Ls-Dyna软件2种材料模型的碳纤维复合材料层合板面内剪切有限元仿真[J]. 机械工程材料, 2020, 44(12): 85-90, 96.
[5] CHRISTIAN P, MACRO T, CHRISTIAN L, et al. Numerical prediction of composite damage behavior: a modeling approach including the strain-rate-dependent material response[J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 292: 115628.
[6] KUHN P, CATALANOTTI G, XAVIER J, et al. Determination of the crack resistance curve for intralaminar fiber tensile failure mode in polymer composites under high rate loading[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 204: 276-287.
[7] LIU Z, XIA Y. Development of a numerical material model for axial crushing mechanical characterization of woven CFRP composites[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 230: 111531.
[8] ANTON M, JACOB L, ROBERT LT, et al. A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1995, 20(2): 125-152.
[9] Livermore Software Technology Corporation. Composite models[EB/OL]. (2018-04-12)[2024-02-21].https://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/support/FAQ_kw/composites/M58_Theory.pdf.
[10] LS-DYNA. LS-DYNA keyword user's manual volume Ⅱ: material models[M]. Livermore Software Technology Corporation(LSTC), 2022.
[11] LS-DYNA. LS-DYNA theory manual[M]. Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), 2022.
[12] XIAO X R, BOTKIN M E, JOHNSON N L. Axial crush simulation of braided carbon tubes using MAT58 in LS-DYNA[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2009, 47(6-7): 740-749.
[13] BAZANT Z P, DANIEL I M, LI Z Z. Size effect and fracture characteristics of composite laminates[J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1996, 118(3): 317-324.
[14] MAIMI P, CAMANHO P P, MAYUGO J A, et al. A continuum damage model for composite laminates: part Ⅱ-computational implementation and validation[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2007, 39(10): 909-919.
[15] BAO G, HO S, SUO Z, et al. The role of material orthotropy in fracture specimens for composites[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1992, 29(9): 1105-1116.
[16] SUO Z, BAO G, FAN B, et al. Orthotropy rescaling and implications for fracture in composites[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1991, 28(2): 235-248.
[17] 牛春匀. 实用飞机复合材料结构设计与制造[M]. 程小全, 张纪奎译. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2010.
[18] 沈真, 陈普会, 刘俊石, 等. 含缺陷复合材料层压板的压缩破坏机理[J]. 航空学报, 1991, 12(3): 106-113.
[19] JOAKIM S. Coefficient of friction of composite delamination surfaces[J]. Wear, 2000, 237(1): 77-89.
[20] ABRATE S. Impact on composite structures[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

基于MAT_58模型的碳纤维增强复合材料仿真参数捕捉与验证

Parameters calibration and validation of carbon fiber reinforced composite based on *MAT_58 model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	文劲钧, 屈美娇, 沈永鳌, 李孟奇, 宋雨恒, 朱瀚锐. 一种考虑应变率的复合材料动态压缩响应预测模型[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(7): 23-30.
[2]	关天宇, 姜岚, 段国勇, 唐波. 碳纤维加固输电铁塔角钢有效性分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(6): 48-59.
[3]	邢文涛, 孙会来, 李航, 刘雨, 赵方方. 螺旋铣磨碳纤维复合材料铣磨力仿真及试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(6): 69-75.
[4]	文湘隆, 何珍钟, 臧猛, 宋春生, 张锦光. 基于黏弹性材料的高阻尼复合材料传动轴减振性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(6): 87-94.
[5]	曾塘玉, 马传国, 向阳, 邵士磊. BN粒子改性PVDF电纺纤维膜插层增强碳纤维/环氧树脂复合材料层间韧性[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(4): 26-32.
[6]	桂林景, 张世广, 李皓, 王安康, 梁鑫河, 夏岩峰, 刘佳. 复合材料过盈铆接结构吸湿老化行为研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(4): 97-104.
[7]	杨思鑫, 曹忠亮, 顾付伟. 双三角点阵夹芯结构低速冲击下的动态响应与失效机制[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 25-34.
[8]	刘雁鹏, 韩宇泽, 任中杰, 任明法. 超薄单层碳纤维增强复合材料板拉伸和压缩失效行为研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(12): 19-25.
[9]	杨青, 程超, 刁春霞, 吕玥蒽, 周飞, 丁小马, 陈正国. 环氧树脂改性聚双环戊二烯及其碳纤维复合材料的制备与表征[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2023, 0(5): 32-36.
[10]	温智超, 屈美娇, 李哲旭, 李孟奇, 董秋雨, 孙戬. SHPB试验中碳纤维增强复合材料试样的尺寸效应数值模拟分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2023, 0(4): 14-20.
[11]	郭卫东, 于峰, 谈嗣勇, 方圆, 秦尹, 王宗森, 郭生全. CFRP条带加固RC梁斜裂缝投影长度的计算方法[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2023, 0(4): 51-55.
[12]	杨阳, 林英豪, 王元伍, 范以撒. 车用碳纤维增强复合材料连接结构耐久性研究及失效机理分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2023, 0(10): 78-86.
[13]	贾宝惠, 王浩, 卢翔, 单金洋, 赵耀斌. 湿热环境下含分层损伤碳纤维/环氧树脂层合板振动特性[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(9): 54-61.
[14]	黄宇轩, 范凌云, 高婧. 先张法CFRP筋预应力海水海砂混凝土板传递长度分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(12): 37-45.
[15]	李建伟, 秦强强, 韩冰, 周金柱. 大型天线罩的模态分析与实验验证[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(1): 54-61.