不同力学特性胶对胶栓混接GFRP梁柱节点的抗震性能的影响

doi:10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20251228.016

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (12): 123-130.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20251228.016

不同力学特性胶对胶栓混接GFRP梁柱节点的抗震性能的影响

刘洛含¹, 肖潇^1*, 张志恒²

1.南华大学土木工程学院,衡阳 421001;
2.南华大学结构实验室,衡阳 421001

收稿日期:2024-11-18 出版日期:2026-02-06 发布日期:2026-02-06
通讯作者: 肖潇(1968—),男,博士,副教授,主要从事复合材料结构性能方面的研究,brightxiao@163.com。
作者简介:刘洛含(1998—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事复合材料结构性能方面的研究。
基金资助:
湖南省自然科学基金项目(2021JJ50015);湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目(20A426)

The influence of adhesives with different mechanical properties on the seismic performance of GFRP beam column joints with adhesive bolted joints

LIU Luohan¹, XIAO Xiao^1*, ZHANG Zhiheng²

1. School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

Received:2024-11-18 Online:2026-02-06 Published:2026-02-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对套筒连接的GFRP梁柱节点在循环荷载下容易发生梁撕裂和耗能不足的问题,基于试验结果研究节点的破坏模式以及抗震性能,分析并且比较是否加入胶黏剂以及加入不同力学性能的胶黏剂后节点抗震性能提升效果。在套筒连接的基础上,加入不同力学性能的胶黏剂,制作了无胶、柔性胶、刚性胶、组合胶4组GFRP梁柱节点并进行低周反复加载试验,研究强度不同的胶对节点抗震性能的影响。结果表明:相较于无胶,加入柔性胶后,节点耗能大约提升了97.19%;加入刚性胶后,节点耗能大约提升了298.86%。柔性胶相较于刚性胶容易撕裂,胶撕裂后导致节点表现接近无胶组。刚性胶和组合胶结果相近,说明在套筒侧面涂抹不同力学性能胶黏剂的作用差异不大。刚性胶组没有撕裂现象,破坏模式为套筒屈曲断裂,梁柱完好无损。建议在套筒连接模式下加入刚性胶,以提高节点的抗震性能。

关键词: GFRP梁柱节点, 胶栓连接, 滞回曲线, 耗能

Abstract: In response to the issue of beam failure and insufficient energy dissipation in GFRP beam column joints with sleeve connections under cyclic loading, the failure mode and seismic performance of the joints were studied based on experimental study. The improvement of seismic performance of the joints after adding or not add adhesives and influence of different kind of adhesives was analyzed and compared. On the basis of sleeve connection, this paper provides four groups of GFRP beam column joints: non-adhesive, flexible adhesive, rigid adhesive, and mix adhesive, and conducted low cycle repeated loading tests to study the influence of adhesives with different strengths on the seismic performance of the joints. The results showed that the addition of flexible adhesive increased the energy consumption of joints by approximately 97.19%, compared to non-adhesive. While the addition of rigid adhesive increased the energy consumption of joints by approximately 298.86%. Flexible adhesive is more prone to cracking compared to rigid adhesive, and after the adhesive is failed, the joint performance to approach that of a non-adhesive group. The results of rigid adhesive and mix adhesive are similar, indicated that the effect of adhesives with different characteristics on the side of the sleeve is not significantly different. There is no cracks in the rigid adhesive group, and the failure mode is sleeve buckling, with the beam and column intact. It is recommended to add rigid adhesive in the sleeve connection to improve the seismic performance of the joints.

Key words: GFRP beam column joints, bult-bonded connections, hysteresis curve, energy consumption

中图分类号:

TB332

刘洛含, 肖潇, 张志恒. 不同力学特性胶对胶栓混接GFRP梁柱节点的抗震性能的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025, 0(12): 123-130.

LIU Luohan, XIAO Xiao, ZHANG Zhiheng. The influence of adhesives with different mechanical properties on the seismic performance of GFRP beam column joints with adhesive bolted joints[J]. COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 0(12): 123-130.

参考文献

[1] HOLLAWAY L C. Review of the present and future utilisation of FRP composites in the civil infrastructure with reference to their important in-service properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2010, 24(12): 2419-2445.
[2] EINDE D V L, ZHAO L, SEIBLE F. Use of FRP composites in civil structural applications[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2003, 17(6): 389-403.
[3] 朱阳阳. 复合材料边框GFRP在光伏组件中的应用[C]//上海市太阳能学会. 第十九届中国太阳级硅及光伏发电研讨会(19th CSPV)论文集. 西安: 上海市太阳能学会, 2023: 1391-1417.
[4] 复合材料边框的应用优势与技术难点(GFRP)[C]//上海市太阳能学会. 第十九届中国太阳级硅及光伏发电研讨会(19th CSPV)论文集. 西安: 上海市太阳能学会, 2023: 2025-2044.
[5] 王林, 江堃, 刘启超. 玻璃钢材料(GFRP)在建筑节能中的应用[J]. 科技与创新, 2020(13): 99-100, 103.
[6] 田时雨, 任凤鸣, 陈光明. 复材新结构梁柱节点: 研究现状及展望[J]. 工业建筑, 2021, 51(6): 186-197.
[7] 敬麒麟. 纤维增强复合材料在桥梁工程中的发展与应用[J]. 合成纤维, 2024, 53(6): 67-70.
[8] 赵国军, 郭成超, 王复明, 等. 隧道开裂衬砌UV-FRP加固力学特性试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2025, 38(7): 235-246.
[9] 刘霞, 汪昕, 杨谭, 等. FRP拉结件增强预制混凝土夹心外挂墙板抗弯性能研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2025, 55(6): 45-52.
[10] 龚宏伟, 刘元雪, 陈进, 等. 钢-FRP混合配筋转换梁结构抗震性能有限元分析[J]. 地震工程学报, 2024, 46(5): 1097-1108.
[11] 张凯建, 王琳. FRP筋增强海水海砂混凝土材料与构件耐久性能综述[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2024, 41(2): 17-30.
[12] FEROLDI F, RUSSO S. Structural behavior of all-FRP beam-column plate-bolted joints[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2016, 20(4): 04016004.
[13] WU C, ZHANG Z J, BAI Y. Connections of tubular GFRP wall studs to steel beams for building construction[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 95: 64-75.
[14] ZHANG Z J, BAI Y, HE X H, et al. Cyclic performance of bonded sleeve beam-column connections for FRP tubular sections[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, 142: 171-182.
[15] ZHANG Z J, WU C, NIE X, et al. Bonded sleeve connections for joining tubular GFRP beam to steel member: numerical investigation with experimental validation[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 157, 51-61.
[16] 尹向东. 扩孔型GFRP梁柱节点抗震性能研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2021.
[17] 顾靖, 宗钟凌, 谢青海, 等. 基于角钢连接的GFRP梁柱T形节点性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024(7): 53-61, 92.
[18] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震试验规程: JGJ/T 101—2015[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.

不同力学特性胶对胶栓混接GFRP梁柱节点的抗震性能的影响

The influence of adhesives with different mechanical properties on the seismic performance of GFRP beam column joints with adhesive bolted joints

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张正亚, 王志博, 孙明明. 轴向荷载作用下碳纤维布约束损伤混凝土能量耗散试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(2): 81-88.
[2]	宗莉娜, 方海, 周辉. 格构增强复合材料圆筒的侧向抗冲击性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2019, 0(11): 45-49.
[3]	高建岗, 刘鹏飞, 赵启林, 柳锦春. 复合材料预紧力齿连接件剪切疲劳试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2015, 0(8): 25-30.