复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 45-49.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20250528.006

• 基础与力学性能研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同方法测试环氧树脂玻璃化转变温度对比研究

刘伟   

  1. 百思通新材料科技(武汉)有限公司, 武汉 430113
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-30 出版日期:2025-05-28 发布日期:2025-07-11
  • 作者简介:刘伟(1982—),男,学士,研究方向为复合材料及其聚合物基体,bamstone@qq.com。

Comparative study of glass transition temperature of epoxy resin tested by different methods

LIU Wei   

  1. Bamstone New Materials Technology (Wuhan) Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430113, China
  • Received:2024-09-30 Online:2025-05-28 Published:2025-07-11

摘要: 玻璃化转变温度(Tg)作为材料的固有属性,理论上与测试方法无关,但在实际测试中,不同方法及仪器得到的结果通常具有显著的差异。以一组能够完全固化的环氧树脂为研究对象,分别采用差示扫描量热法(DSC)和动态机械分析法(DMA)对其Tg进行测定;通过对比不同方法的测试结果,重点探讨了测试方法、仪器种类、升温速率等差异导致Tg结果存在偏差的原因,为材料的热性能(Tg)表征结果一致性、可靠性与可比性探索了新的思路。

关键词: 玻璃化转变温度, 热流型DSC测试, 功率补偿型DSC测试, 动态机械分析测试

Abstract: Glass transition temperature (Tg), as an inherent property of materials, is theoretically independent of the testing method. However, in practice, significant discrepancies often arise between results obtained using different methods and instruments. This study focused on epoxy resins that can be fully cured, using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) to measure Tg respectively. By comparing the results from these two techniques, the research identifies the causes of discrepancies in Tg values, such as differences in testing methods, instrument types, heating rates, and other factors. The study also explores new approaches to improving the consistency, reliability, and comparability of thermal performance (Tg) characterization across different materials.

Key words: glass transition temperature, heat flow DSC test, power compensation DSC test, dynamic mechanical analysis test

中图分类号: